Wir sind umgezogen!

Freitag, 3. November 2006

Saddam und die Bombe

Hui, da wollte die New York Times doch eigentlich einmal mehr die Regierung Bush kritisieren, diesmal wegen des angeblich saloppen Umgangs mit wichtigen, geheimen Informationen... und heraus kam eine exzellente Begründung für Bushs Krieg gegen Saddam.

In dem Text U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Primer enthüllt William J. Broad , dass die Amerikaner Pläne gefunden haben sollen, die Saddam den raschen Bau einer Atombombe ermöglicht hätten. Diese Pläne werden nun aus Sicherheitsgründen wieder unter Verschluss gehalten.

Der Confederate Yankee kommentiert den Text: NY Times Justifies 2003 Invasion of Iraq

This is a NY Times November bombshell as designed by the North Koreans.

The breaking article seems to be an attempt to attack the Bush Administration for releasing potentially classified information (yes, the ironymeter is pegged), but what they actually prove is that Saddam's nuclear weapons program was indeed a significant threat.

Not only were they close to developing their own nuclear bomb (at one point the Iraqis "were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away"), they also had that nucelar weapon building knowledge available to proliferate to other rogue states.

The Times may have set out to attack Bush, but instead, they have justified the rationale for the 2003 invasion.

Und hier die Reaktion von
U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra:

"With respect to the possibility that documents may have been released that should not have been released, I have always been clear that the Director of National Intelligence should take whatever steps necessary to withhold sensitive documents. In fact, as of today the DNI had withheld 59 percent of the documents that it had reviewed, and has become more risk-averse over time. If the DNI believes that the documents that were released were in the safe 40 percent, imagine what the 60 percent being withheld must contain.

"That said, it is also important to emphasize that the IAEA, contrary to its assertions, never raised any concerns about this material with the United States Government before going to the press. Similarly, the DNI's office has informed me that no agency of the U.S. Government had raised any issues about the potential or actual release of these documents before yesterday. If there were such problems, they would have been better addressed through the appropriate channels rather than the press.

"These documents also raise several additional issues of interest. First, it is extraordinary that the New York Times now acknowledges that the captured documents demonstrate that '[Saddam] Hussein's scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.' This only reinforces the value of these documents in understanding the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's regime. Only 1 percent of the estimated 120 million pages of captured documents have been reviewed, and we must continue working to promptly understand these materials. If there is concern about Saddam's nuclear program, there should be similar concern about potential connections between Saddam and al-Qaeda suggested in the documents.

Mehr Infos auch auf der Seite von Ray Robinson.


  • admin.wmd [at] googlemail.com